On June 5, 2020, the IRS issued proposed Treasury Laws underneath part 4960 of the Inner Income Code of 1986, as amended (the Code).
Part 4960 was added to the Code in 2017 as a part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Part 4960 usually gives that if sure tax-exempt organizations (an “relevant tax-exempt group” or “ATEO”) pay remuneration to sure workers (“coated workers”) in extra of $1,000,000 or an extra parachute fee, the funds are topic to an excise tax on the surplus remuneration and extra parachute funds on the company revenue tax charge, at the moment 21%.
An ATEO is outlined within the Code as any group which for the taxable 12 months is exempt from taxation underneath part 501(a) of the Code (which features a reference to part 501(c) organizations), is a farmers’ cooperative group described in part 521(b)(1), has revenue excluded from taxation underneath part 115(1), or is a political group described in part 527(e)(1). A “coated worker” is an worker (together with any former worker) of an ATEO, if the worker is likely one of the 5 highest-compensated workers of the group for the taxable 12 months or was a “coated worker” of the group (or predecessor) for any previous taxable 12 months starting after Dec. 31, 2016.
“Remuneration” is outlined as wages (as outlined in Code part 3401(a)), besides that such time period doesn’t embrace any designated Roth contribution and contains quantities required to be included in gross revenue underneath part 457(f) (deferred compensation). Remuneration is handled as paid when there’s “no substantial threat of forfeiture” (usually, the chance of not receiving the fee for failure to offer future providers) of the rights to such remuneration. The Code gives that remuneration doesn’t embrace any remuneration paid to a licensed medical skilled (together with a veterinarian) for the efficiency of medical or veterinary providers.
Remuneration paid to a coated worker by an ATEO contains any remuneration paid with respect to employment of such worker by any associated particular person or governmental entity. An individual or governmental entity is handled as associated to an ATEO if such particular person or governmental entity controls, or is managed by, the ATEO; is managed by a number of individuals who management the ATEO; is a supported group (as outlined in part 509(f)(3)) through the taxable 12 months with respect to the ATE; is a supporting group described in Code part 509(a)(3) through the taxable 12 months with respect to the ATEO; or, within the case of an ATEO which is a voluntary workers’ beneficiary affiliation (VEBA), establishes, maintains, or makes contributions to the VEBA. Consequently, remuneration paid by a for-profit company that controls an ATEO to workers of that ATEO is included in computing extra remuneration for functions of part 4960.
An “extra parachute fee” is outlined as an quantity equal to the surplus of any parachute fee over the portion of the “base quantity” allotted to such fee utilizing guidelines much like the principles of part 280G(b)(3) (which outline extra parachute funds within the case of a for-profit company). Funds made to a licensed medical skilled (together with a veterinarian) to the extent the fee is for the efficiency of medical or veterinary providers by the skilled are usually not handled as parachute funds.
On Dec. 31, 2018, the IRS issued Discover 2019-09, setting forth preliminary steerage on the applying of part 4960. The discover gives that taxpayers might depend on the discover till additional steerage is issued. The discover additionally gives that sure interpretations of part 4960 are usually not according to an affordable, good religion interpretation of the statutory language, and that the Treasury Division and the IRS intend to embody these positions as a part of forthcoming proposed laws.
The proposed laws outline “worker” according to the definition of “worker” for functions of federal revenue tax withholding in Code part 3401(c). Particularly, the proposed laws’ cross-references embrace common-law workers, officers or elected or appointed officers of governments, or businesses or instrumentalities thereof, and sure officers of companies. Subsequently, “worker” doesn’t embrace a member of a board of administrators of an organization who is just not additionally an worker of the company. Nonetheless, an officer is an worker of the entity for which the officer serves as an officer (except the officer performs no providers or solely minor providers and neither receives, neither is entitled to obtain, any remuneration).
The proposed laws present that whether or not an worker is likely one of the 5 highest-compensated workers of an ATEO is decided individually for every ATEO and never for the whole group of associated organizations. In consequence, a gaggle of associated ATEOs can have greater than 5 highest-compensated workers for a taxable 12 months. Equally, an worker could also be a coated worker of multiple ATEO in a associated group of organizations for a taxable 12 months. As soon as an worker is a coated worker of an ATEO, the worker continues to be a coated worker for all subsequent taxable years of that ATEO.
An necessary level in making use of part 4960 is that, for functions of figuring out whether or not an worker is one among an ATEO’s 5 highest-compensated workers for a taxable 12 months, remuneration paid by the ATEO through the relevant 12 months is aggregated with remuneration paid by any associated group through the ATEO’s relevant 12 months, together with remuneration paid by a associated for-profit group or governmental entity, for providers carried out as an worker of such associated group. In consequence, there was concern that the excise tax imposed by part 4960 would apply to workers of controlling for-profit companies the place no compensation was paid by the ATEO. The proposed laws include exceptions to handle these points.
An worker is disregarded for functions of figuring out an ATE’s 5 highest-compensated workers for a taxable 12 months if neither the ATEO, nor any associated ATEO, nor any taxable associated group managed by the ATEO pays the worker of the ATEO any remuneration for providers carried out for the ATEO or grants a legally binding proper to uninvested remuneration to the worker.
Additionally excluded from an ATEO’s 5 highest-compensated workers are workers of an ATEO who obtain no remuneration from the ATEO and carry out solely restricted providers for the ATEO; because of this not more than 10% of complete annual hours labored for the ATEO and associated organizations are for providers carried out for the ATEO.
A 3rd exception applies to workers from an ATEO’s 5 highest-compensated who obtain no compensation from an ATEO or an entity managed by an ATEO, and fewer than 50% of the person’s providers are carried out for an ATEO.
Money advantages corresponding to expense reimbursements or director and officer legal responsibility insurance coverage are usually not handled as remuneration for functions of those exceptions.
Remuneration paid to a person who is rarely an worker of the ATEO is just not taken under consideration for functions of part 4960. For instance, a person who performs providers for the ATEO solely as a bona fide impartial contractor is just not an worker of the ATEO, and thus is just not thought of for functions of figuring out the ATEO’s 5 highest-compensated workers. Equally, a person who, underneath all of the details and circumstances, performs providers solely as a bona fide worker of a associated group, together with a associated group that gives providers to the ATEO, is just not an worker of the ATEO and thus is just not thought of for functions of figuring out the ATEO’s 5 highest-compensated workers.
These laws are proposed to use to taxable years starting on or after the date the ultimate laws are printed within the Federal Register. The proposed laws don’t present a grandfather rule. Nonetheless, these proposed laws present guidelines which have the impact of grandfathering sure compensation. The proposed laws present that any nonqualified deferred compensation that vested previous to the primary day of the primary taxable 12 months of the ATEO starting after Dec. 31, 2017, is just not thought of remuneration for functions of part 4960. Funds underneath contracts entered into earlier than the date of enactment are usually not excluded from part 4960, apart from deferred compensation earned previous to the date of enactment.
The steerage supplied within the proposed laws usually is according to the steerage supplied in Discover 2019-09. Nonetheless, in sure cases these proposed laws modify the steerage supplied in Discover 2019-09. Till the applicability date of the ultimate laws, taxpayers might depend on the steerage supplied in Discover 2019-09 or, alternatively, on the steerage supplied in these proposed laws.
©2020 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved. Nationwide Legislation Evaluation, Quantity X, Quantity 176