Most employers wrestling with COVID-19 associated employment regulation points aren’t paying a lot consideration to the labor regulation points arising out of the pandemic. Certainly, as a result of most U.S. employers are non-union, many function underneath the mistaken perception that they fall exterior the attain of the Nationwide Labor Relations Act (Act or NLRA) and don’t should concern themselves with labor regulation compliance. Nevertheless, the NLRA protects nearly all non-public sector staff no matter whether or not they’re union-represented or not. Accordingly, apart from these using agricultural staff or employees lined by the Railway Labor Act, each unionized and union-free employers are topic to the NLRA and should conform their personnel insurance policies, practices and decision-making to the Act.
Presently, COVID-19 associated labor regulation points are cropping up left and proper with many pandemic associated unfair labor apply prices being filed with the Nationwide Labor Relations Board (Board or NLRB) towards each union and non-union employers. Not too long ago, the NLRB Normal Counsel and his Division of Recommendation spoke on a number of of the labor points occasioned by the pandemic and/or teed up in ULP prices. Thankfully, a number of of the current pronouncements are excellent news and supply good recommendation for administration, exhibiting the best way by means of the minefield referred to as the NLRA.
A. Opposed Motion Based mostly on Protected Concerted Actions (PCA) Regarding COVID
NLRA Part 7 ensures to all staff the fitting to have interaction in protected concerted actions (PCA), typically outlined as motion taken by a couple of worker for his or her mutual assist and/or widespread safety. This part offers all staff — together with non-union staff — the fitting to band collectively and act in furtherance of their widespread pursuits. NLRA Part 8(a)(1) of the Act prohibits all employers — together with non-union employers — from interfering, restraining or coercing staff within the train of their Part 7 rights. It’s right here the place non-union (in addition to unionized) firms most sometimes run afoul of the NLRA.
Despite the fact that the concerted prong of PCA sometimes requires two or extra staff to behave in “live performance” with each other, in some cases the conduct of a single employee might qualify as protected conduct as a result of it’s with the authority or in furtherance of different staff’ issues or as a result of by his/her particular person conduct, an worker is searching for to provoke or put together for concerted motion. Nevertheless, absent that connection to the issues and pursuits of others, a person worker’s conduct, complaints and gripes private to that worker aren’t thought-about “concerted” and, thus, not protected, despite the fact that they might relate to wages and dealing situations.
A current COVID-19 associated unfair labor practices (ULP) case demonstrating this level was just lately mentioned and dismissed in an recommendation memo in Larry Peel Co., Case No. 16-CA-259403, issued on June 15. There, an worker was discharged for requesting that he be allowed to do business from home on account of COVID-19 and never report back to work. The query introduced was whether or not that request certified as protected conduct, rendering his discharge a violation of Part 8(a)(1). The NLRB mentioned this was not protected exercise as a result of the worker’s request, although associated to working situations, was particular person and didn’t concern itself with the curiosity or issues of others. Accordingly, the employer’s discharge didn’t violate Part 8(a)(1) (although it could have violated another employment legal guidelines exterior the NLRA).
The end result of this case may need been totally different had the worker couched his request by way of staff, on the whole, or he and his coworkers needing to be allowed to do business from home on account of COVID-19 since that request may need been deemed “concerted.” Thus, it’s a advantageous line and case particular for employers making an attempt to separate concerted conduct from exercise that isn’t “concerted,” for the aim of guaranteeing NLRA compliance when meting out self-discipline for COVID-19 associated conduct. Such protected concerted conduct might embody work stoppages over pandemic associated well being and security issues, financial points like hazard pay, and staff asking questions and interesting in or calling for office investigations associated to COVID-19 associated office points. Typically, the “concerted” boundary is lower than a vivid line.
Along with PCA questions, different COVID-19 points generally dealing with non-union employers embody however aren’t restricted to the next: lawfully promulgate and implement COVID-19 work guidelines that will have an effect on Part 7 rights and lawfully and successfully deal with attainable union organizing spawned by the pandemic.
B. Making Unilateral Adjustments in Working Situations Attributable to COVID-19
Unionized employers are underneath an obligation to acknowledge and cut price with their employees’ union as to their wages, hours, working situations, and different phrases and situations of employment. This bargaining obligation signifies that a union employer might not make a unilateral change within the working situations of its union staff except the employer has first met its obligation to cut price, its obligation to cut price is excused or mitigated by operation of regulation or waived. This bargaining obligation applies to each an employer’s choice to vary working situations, in addition to the consequences of that change on the bargaining unit.
Typically, these modifications are made out of prudence whereas different instances, they’re mandated by state, native or federal orders. However no matter their cause, the NLRA’s requirement mandating upkeep of the established order, pending bargaining, is problematic for union employers needing to shortly implement time-sensitive office modifications to be able to keep away from or mitigate COVID-19 dangers. In recognition of this pressure, the GC issued GC Memo 20-04 entitled Case Summaries Pertaining to the Obligation to Cut price in Emergency Conditions issued on March 27. Whereas providing employers no clear recommendation on deal with exigent COVID points, the GC did acknowledge the existence of an exception to the obligation to cut price the place an employer can display that financial exigencies compelled immediate motion, stressing that such exigencies had been restricted to extraordinary occasions which are unexpected occurrences having a significant financial impact and require an organization to take fast motion. The place native governments order sheltering in place, the shutdown of non-essential companies or the usage of sure private protecting tools or in areas the place COVID-19 outbreaks are sudden or significantly acute, this restricted exception is more likely to apply, thereby permitting an employer to make and implement important choices with out prior bargaining. Nevertheless, the place that’s the case and except additional bargaining is waived by contract or by a union’s inaction, an employer will nonetheless be obligated to cut price regarding the impact mentioned unilateral choice has on the bargaining unit.
The phrases of labor contracts can also privilege an employer to take unilateral motion with out prior bargaining. For example, the place a labor contract seems to sanction, cowl or anticipate the making of a selected motion, that motion might not qualify as a “change” and its implementation is probably not deemed “unilateral” as a result of it has already been mentioned and bargained over (Contract Protection Take a look at). A current COVID-19-related case, issued on June 30, demonstrating this level is Youngsters Faculty Companies, Case No. 5-CA-258669, the place the Division of Recommendation dismissed a refusal to cut price ULP cost towards a contractor that equipped nursing employees to D.C. public colleges who unilaterally gave its employees the selection of being laid off or being briefly assigned to performing COVID-19 testing after the citywide shutdown of colleges on account of COVID-19. Citing the events’ Labor Settlement which contained each a element provision addressing layoffs and a administration rights clause authorizing layoffs, Recommendation concluded that the layoffs had been throughout the “compass or scope” of the contract’s provision, granting the employer the fitting to put off the employees unilaterally. Likewise, citing the Settlement’s broad zipper clause waiving additional bargaining throughout the time period of the Settlement as to issues not referred to or lined by the Settlement, Recommendation concluded that the contract doubtless foreclosed any obligation to have interaction in results bargaining as to the layoffs or different work assignments, i.e. COVID-19 testing, in lieu of layoff.
C. Union Entry Regarding COVID-19
Unions have sought entry to employer’s premises throughout the pandemic for the aim of monitoring working situations in relation to virus dangers and/or guaranteeing labor contract compliance. Union entry is mostly a matter of state regulation and/or ruled by the phrases of a labor contract as a result of the NLRA is silent on the difficulty and doesn’t grant to unions an affirmative proper to enter an employer’s property. Nevertheless, the place a labor contract grants a union a proper of entry, that entry proper is a situation of employment which the employer should honor in accordance with the phrases of that contract.
In bizarre instances, union entry is probably not that huge of a deal. However with the continuing pandemic, employers wish to restrict and management these getting into their premises as a manner of containing the unfold of an infection. Accordingly, employers need to their contracts as a manner of limiting and controlling union entry to their premises in addition to regulating their conduct whereas on the premises. A case demonstrating this level is RS Electrical Corp., Case No. 14-CA-260142, the place Recommendation concurred with the dismissal of a cost complaining about an employer’s refusal to grant entry. Right here, the events’ contract gave the union the fitting to entry job websites “at any affordable time” which the union argued gave them a proper to fast and unrestricted entry. The employer disagreed, arguing alternatively, that this contractual reference gave it a proper to 1 hour’s advance discover to organize for protected entry. Addressing these competing readings of the labor settlement, Recommendation concluded that the Board is not going to select between two equally believable interpretations of the contract for, “right here, it isn’t in any respect clear that the union’s demand for fast unrestricted entry was affordable in gentle of the COVID-19 pandemic.” Moreover, the contractual restrict on entry to “any affordable time” gave the employer the fitting underneath the Contract Protection Take a look at to require one-hour advance discover.
As you’re conscious, issues are altering shortly and there’s a lack of clear-cut authority or vivid line guidelines on implementation. This text shouldn’t be meant to be an unequivocal, one-size suits all steering, however as an alternative represents our interpretation of the place issues at present and customarily stand. This text doesn’t deal with the potential impacts of the quite a few different native, state and federal orders which have been issued in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, together with, with out limitation, potential legal responsibility ought to an worker develop into sick, necessities relating to household go away, sick pay and different points.
 Amongst different issues, the Board’s Normal Counsel, Peter Robb, acts because the NLRB’s chief regulation enforcement official. Appearing by means of the Company’s regional workplaces, he’s in the end liable for ULP cost investigations and the prosecution of these prices his workplace believes to be meritorious.
 The Division of Recommendation is a gaggle residing within the GC’s workplace charged with evaluating circumstances presenting novel problems with regulation and giving regional workplace “recommendation” as to deserves of pending prices.
 Labor Administration Relations Act Part 502 presents a restricted exception to the requirement that conduct must be concerted to be able to be protected. It authorizes and protects even single staff who “refuse to work” due to abnormally harmful office situations.
Copyright © 2020, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.Nationwide Legislation Evaluate, Quantity X, Quantity 205