Tuesday, September 15, 2020
On August 31, each homes of the California legislature handed and despatched to Governor Newsom for signature the California Client Monetary Safety Regulation (the CCFPL). Efficient on January 1, 2021 if Governor Newsom indicators the invoice (which he’s anticipated to do), the Division of Enterprise Oversight might be changed by the Division of Monetary Safety and Innovation (DFPI). A lot of the legislation comes straight from Title X of the Dodd-Frank Act, with a selected deal with shopper safety. Whereas the DBO has authority to implement particular legal guidelines, the main target of the DFPI might be on the sorts of services which might be supplied, with out linking the company’s authority to explicit statutes.
Importantly, the legislation exempts nationwide banks, banks chartered by California or another state, current DBO licensees (apart from payday lenders and scholar mortgage servicers), and licensees and their workers which might be performing below the authority of one other state company’s license, resembling actual property brokers and their workers who’re licensed below the California Actual Property Regulation. The legislation will apply to “coated individuals,” which is outlined as individuals engaged in providing or offering shopper monetary services or products, associates that act as service suppliers, and any service supplier that engages within the providing or provision of its personal shopper monetary services or products. As in Title 10 of the Dodd-Frank Act, a “service supplier” is any particular person that gives a cloth service to a coated particular person in reference to the coated particular person’s providing or offering of a shopper monetary services or products. It’s anticipated that the legislation will apply to, amongst others, debt collectors, fintech corporations, credit score reporting companies, and service provider money advance corporations.
The legislation will give the DFPI the identical authority regarding illegal, misleading or abusive acts or practices (UDAAP) that Title 10 of the Dodd-Frank Act provides to the CFPB. The DFPI could have the facility to take enforcement motion in opposition to coated individuals for UDAAP violations, and could have the authority to difficulty laws relating to UDAAP. The legislation additionally permits the DFPI to deliver proceedings pursuant to provisions of Title X of the Dodd-Frank Act authorizing state regulators to implement Title X and any laws promulgated by the CFPB pursuant to Title X. The DFPI can deliver these proceedings in opposition to each coated individuals below the legislation in addition to current DBO licensees, however the DFPI should give advance discover to the CFPB if it depends on this authority to deliver actions in opposition to current licensees.
The legislation authorizes the DFPI to prescribe guidelines defining UDAAP, which can apply to coated individuals, however the DFPI should interpret “unfair” and “misleading” in accordance with California Enterprise & Professions Code Part 17200 and circumstances deciphering that provision. “Abusive” is outlined in the identical method as below the Dodd-Frank Act, and requires the DFPI to interpret the time period constantly with Title X or if inconsistent, in favor of higher protections and extra expansive protection.
In the one provision of the legislation that doesn’t concern customers, the legislation authorizes the DFPI to outline UDAAP in reference to the providing of economic financing or different monetary services to small companies, nonprofits and household farms.
The DFPI is permitted to deliver a civil motion or an administrative continuing for a violation of the CCFPL, a rule or remaining order, or a situation imposed In writing by the DFPI. The DFPI can even have the authority to difficulty desist and chorus orders. There’s a 4 yr statute of limitations from the date a violation is found for civil actions below the CCFPL, which is one yr longer than below Title X of the Dodd-Frank Act. Just like the CFPB, the DFPI might search broad reduction for UDAAP violations, together with rescission or reformation of contracts, refunds, restitution, disgorgement, compensation for unjust enrichment, damages, injunctive reduction and civil cash penalties.
Individually, the California legislature handed a legislation on August 31 requiring debt collectors to be licensed.
Copyright © 2020, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.Nationwide Regulation Assessment, Quantity X, Quantity 259